Saturday, January 31, 2009

Vanishing Rain Forests? Hardly

For years, media reports and the so-called experts have been saying that the rain forests were disappearing and that if action wasn't taken soon, they might disappear completely.

Well, just the opposite has been happening, and it's due to people seeking out a better life. Rain forests are regrowing across vast swaths of the world as people move from the forests to urban areas seeking out a better life.

Economic development and an improved standard of living contribute greatly to an improved environment. It actually encourages people to move from rain forests and the use of slash and burn techniques to coax crops in poor jungle soils for a few years before having to duplicate that elsewhere.
The idea has stirred outrage among environmentalists who believe that vigorous efforts to protect native rain forest should remain a top priority. But the notion has gained currency in mainstream organizations like the Smithsonian Institution and the United Nations, which in 2005 concluded that new forests were “increasing dramatically” and “undervalued” for their environmental benefits. The United Nations is undertaking the first global catalog of the new forests, which vary greatly in their stage of growth.

“Biologists were ignoring these huge population trends and acting as if only original forest has conservation value, and that’s just wrong,” said Joe Wright, a senior scientist at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute here, who set off a firestorm two years ago by suggesting that the new forests could substantially compensate for rain forest destruction.

“Is this a real rain forest?” Dr. Wright asked, walking the land of a former American cacao plantation that was abandoned about 50 years ago, and pointing to fig trees and vast webs of community spiders and howler monkeys.

“A botanist can look at the trees here and know this is regrowth,” he said. “But the temperature and humidity are right. Look at the number of birds! It works. This is a suitable habitat.”

Dr. Wright and others say the overzealous protection of rain forests not only prevents poor local people from profiting from the rain forests on their land but also robs financing and attention from other approaches to fighting global warming, like eliminating coal plants.

But other scientists, including some of Dr. Wright’s closest colleagues, disagree, saying that forceful protection of rain forests is especially important in the face of threats from industrialized farming and logging.

The issue has also set off a debate over the true definition of a rain forest. How do old forests compare with new ones in their environmental value? Is every rain forest sacred?

“Yes, there are forests growing back, but not all forests are equal,” said Bill Laurance, another senior scientist at the Smithsonian, who has worked extensively in the Amazon.

He scoffed as he viewed Ms. Ortega de Wing’s overgrown land: “This is a caricature of a rain forest!” he said. “There’s no canopy, there’s too much light, there are only a few species. There is a lot of change all around here whittling away at the forest, from highways to development.”
Of course, the Times spends considerable ink trying to justify that the new jungle growth isn't the same as the old ones. Given enough time, they will.

Further encourage the economic development, and you will not only slow the cutting of pristine jungle environments, but hasten the departure of those who engage in the slash and burn subsistence farming that results in destruction of jungle habitat.

Cease. FIRE! Hamas Attacks Again

It's another day in the neighborhood and Hamas has again taken to firing its rockets into Israel. A grad rocket slammed into Ashkelon, but thankfully there were no injuries or any damage.

The diplomats will yawn and ignore it. The Israeli political class will likely do the same. There's a ceasefire to uphold, even though Israel ceases and Hamas fires.

Tony Blair shows his utter cluelessness, and even Hamas calls him a mo-ron in the process. He says that Hamas must be part of the peace process. Blair, like most diplomats, simply ignores the part about how Hamas not only doesn't recognize Israel, but actively seeks its annihilation. It's part of the Hamas charter and it's part and parcel of the Islamist ideology that Hamas seeks to spread to all those under its thumb.

Hamas is part and parcel of the Islamist ideology; the same ideology that is kindred spirits with the likes of al Qaeda.

The diplomats continue to make baseless claims, such as how Israel has created an open-air prison in Gaza, despite the fact that it is wholly of Hamas' own doing. Hamas sought war with Israel, and Israel is under no obligation to provide Hamas with the means to fight its war (even though Israel does provide humanitarian aid that is often stolen and siphoned off by Hamas for use in building its rockets and explosives).

Besides, Egypt has its borders sealed with Gaza as well, and yet we don't hear an outcry over that particular fact. Egypt is under no obligation to have a sealed border with Gaza, and yet it does. It even continues to arrest people engaged in operating the smuggling tunnels. Fancy that.

Porkfest 2008: Democrats Need GOP To Provide Cover

The porkfest that the media continues to call a stimulus package, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of the money in the sprawling $825 billion ($1.1 trillion when all costs are factored in) applies most of the money in the years following when most experts believe the recession to end.

In fact, most experts believe that the recession will end by the end of this year, without any need for further stimulus. Throwing down hundreds of billions of dollars in money that the nation doesn't have will not solve the problem, but the Democrats keep urging the GOP to sign on board with this nonsense.

Democrats can own the porkfest all on their lonesome. They don't need GOP votes to make it happen. They do need GOP votes to get cover when things don't work out as planned. The GOP shouldn't oblige them as they did on the original TARP legislation, that ended up passing because the Democrats larded up that mess with pork. That's the solution to the mess to secure votes; pork it up.

Here's my advice to the GOP. You want to show that you're fiscally responsible? Here's how to do it.

Demand that the stimulus bill drop all spending that doesn't come within the fiscal year that ends in October. If the spending occurs in 2010, 2011, or 2012 or beyond, it gets dropped. If it isn't directly on infrastructure improvements, it gets dropped.

You want to see how quickly the $825 billion ($1.1 trillion once interest and added costs are figured in) drops to something in the range of $80 billion?

That's how to do it. The GOP should introduce their own legislation that takes only those items that actually result in infrastructure and stimulus to the economy within the next nine months. Everything else gets dropped. Show the public just what a fiscally responsible bill looks like. Shame the Democrats (I know, that's pretty well impossible to do, but most Americans will start to realize the mess the Democrats are about to make).

The Democrats got their wish list out and they're demanding that the GOP go along with it. Why? Out of bipartisanship? Hardly. There's nothing bipartisan about it. It is a laundry list of out of control government spending that will not assist in economic recovery, and it's not even likely that that spending occuring during the current year will bring about the end of the recession; lowering taxes and providing incentives for businesses to grow will spur the economy into a recovery. Government spending will retard and delay the recovery. History has shown this to be the case, and yet the Democrats want to use the opportunity to expand government into areas that it has repeatedly shown itself to be wanting - health care in particular.

Enough is enough.

UPDATE:
The fecklessness of the Democrats knows no bounds. On top of the porkfest, the Obama Administration is calling for 10% cut in defense spending. Amazing. He's going to undermine the nation's national security to ensure that billions get spent on programs that have been abject failures for decades.

Obama's Half Brother Arrested In Kenya On Drug Charges

We already have our Billy Carter moment for President Obama. His half brother was arrested in Kenya on drug charges.
The half-brother of President Barack Obama has been arrested for alleged possession of marijuana, Kenyan police said Saturday.

Area police chief Joshua Omokulongolo said George Obama was picked up Saturday and was being held at the Huruma police post in the capital.

Omokulongolo said officers found one joint of marijuana on him.

Obama reportedly denied the allegations.

"I don't know why they are charging me," CNN quoted Obama as saying from jail.
Billy Carter was known for his outlandish actions, and became a running gag line for comics.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Another Obama Nominee Has Tax Problems

This time, it's Tom Daschle, who President Obama nominated to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. Daschle, the former Senate Majority Leader, failed to pay more than $100,000 in taxes over a period of three years relating to the use of a car and driver provided by businessman and former AT&T executive Leo Hindery. ABC News reports:
The Daschle spokesperson insisted that the senator is the one who should get credit for discovering, fixing and disclosing the tax issue.

"In June 2008, Sen. Daschle mentioned the use of the car to his personal accountant and asked him if there were any potential tax consequences," the spokesperson said. "His accountant said that there could be tax consequences and said he was going to fix them as part of Daschle's 2008 filing. So when he got down to vetting, Sen. Daschle decided to amend his returns for 2005, 2006 and 2007, and he paid all the taxes. At the urging of Daschle, the accountant was very conservative in his estimates."

Daschle has long been one of President Obama's closest advisers, so it was no surprise when the mild-mannered pol was named Obama's nominee to be HHS Secretary shortly after Obama won election; his official nomination came Dec. 11, 2008.
Where was Daschle to find the problem before his name was floated as a cabinet pick? Why wasn't it picked up after the first year of error?

Sorry, but Daschle doesn't get credit for finding the mistake. It's one that should have been reported to the IRS sooner. I suspect that Daschle would have continued with the nonpayment of taxes unless and until he was in a position requiring such disclosure. In other words, it was the threat of being caught during the nomination process that spurred him to "catch" his own tax mess.

No credit inures to him for that.

Daschle is the second Obama nominee to have tax problems, after Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. That's not a good showing by any stretch, and it once again highlights the complexity of the tax code and how and why simplification is an absolute necessity to insure compliance and proper calculation of tax obligations.

Iranian Backchannel Diplomacy

Former Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry apparently held a series of secret talks with Iranian officials last year.
Former U.S. officials have had numerous conversations with Iranians over the years, but few, if any, with officials as influential as Mr. Samareh.

It was not clear whether Mr. Perry, a veteran statesman who also served as a Clinton administration troubleshooter on the North Korean nuclear program, was acting at the behest of the Bush administration or others. The Bush White House rejected several overtures for back-channel talks with Iranian officials in 2005 and 2006.

Mr. Perry was traveling and not available to comment, his office said.

The United States has accused Iran of developing a program that could give it nuclear weapons and supporting Arab militant groups. Iran denies that it is seeking weapons and says groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah are freedom fighters, not terrorists.

The talks were revealed as U.S. and European diplomats predicted that the Obama administration would not rush into high-level official meetings with Iran before the nation holds presidential elections in June. An aide to Mr. Ahmadinejad said Wednesday that the president will seek re-election.

The diplomats said the U.S. does not want to take actions that could boost Mr. Ahmadinejad's chances.

An Iranian Web site, Yari News, first reported Thursday that talks between Mr. Perry and Mr. Samareh were "about to be held" in Europe. Mr. Samareh, speaking to the Fars News Agency in Iran, denied this.
The subject of those talks, and who authorized the talks is not revealed, but it is hard to believe that the Bush Administration didn't know about them. If they didn't know, then who did.

Meanwhile, reports that the Obama Administration was trying to pen a letter to the Iranians have come up short. The US State Department denies any such action.
The White House and the State Department denied on Thursday a report in the British newspaper the Guardian that Obama administration was working on a letter to Iranian leadership aimed at easing relations between the two countries. The newspaper said the letter was in response to one sent to Obama by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad shortly after Obama was elected.

White House spokesperson Robert Gibbs told reporters, "Neither the president nor the secretary of state has seen such a letter.” He added that there are a number of issues that the administration would like to see the Iranian leadership address, including its “illicit” nuclear program, support for terrorism and threats against Israel.
Backchannel diplomacy is a necessary part of foreign policy and allows plausible deniability when such efforts become public.

Backchannel diplomacy enabled Oslo to come to fruition, allowing Palestinian and Israeli negotiators to work on that deal, however flawed it turned out to be.

It has its place, but the circumstances of Perry's meetings makes one wonder who suggested and directed that the meetings take place; whether this was an effort by the incoming Obama Administration to get something started and/or the Bush Administration facilitating a smoother transfer of power to the incoming Obama Administration.

Restaurant Review: Ridge Thai in Ridgewood

Nestled in the heart of Ridgewood, New Jersey, Ridge Thai delivers excellent Thai food at a reasonable price. The small establishment, with gold leaf accents on the walls and fresh bouquets of flowers strategically placed to bring pops of color, delivers a flavorful and delightful meal.

I started off with Tom Kha Ghi, a soup with a coconut milk broth base with chicken, onions, and pepper. It was quite flavorful, while Mrs. Lawhawk's Soup Tao-Hua was very light and delicate with chicken, bean curd, and scallions.

Our main courses were well presented and very tasty, including the bean curd with vegetables and a Ridge Thai specialty, the Golden Nest, which is chicken, vegetables, cashews, pineapple, and rests in a nest of noodles. My only complaint about the nest of noodles is that it wasn't crisp enough.

Ridge Thai's preparations are lighter than most Thai restaurants you'll find, which is a refreshing difference from the heavier sauces you'll find elsewhere. Tommy Eats seems to agree.

Evidence Continues Piling Up On Hamas War Crimes

Maybe Gazans are starting to get the idea that supporting Hamas was a real bad idea and counterproductive? They are starting to voice their knowledge of being used as human shields.

They were powerless to resist or so they claim. After all, Hamas had the guns and the willingness to murder those who oppose their terror regime.

And now they've got money that they're using to buy off Gazans who were affected by Hamas attacks on Israel and the resulting damage done by Israeli counterattacks.
A Hamas cabinet minister carried a carton stuffed with checks worth nearly $2 million into a Gaza tent camp pitched on the ruins of the Salam neighborhood, close to the Israeli border.

But before hundreds of homeless residents could collect, they had to listen to a political speech. Social Affairs Minister Ahmed al-Kurd told them Israel's military machine was defeated and that the Hamas government would rebuild their neighborhood bigger and better.

"There's a lot of talk," resident Zayed Khader, 45, said after the speech, as he waited for his name to be called so he could pick up relief checks worth a total of $6,000 for his family of nine. "When I see them actually building my house, I'll say these are good words."

The IDF operation in Gaza ended 10 days ago, but many Gazans complain that political maneuvering - both between Hamas and Fatah, and in the international community - is slowing the delivery of urgently needed aid to Gaza.


Meanwhile, this is a ban I could get behind. Palestinians want to ban the BBC from Gaza. Considering that the BBC is anti-Israel in its editorial slant, removing it from Gaza would actually be an improvement. Of course, the Palestinians want to ban the BBC because the BBC didn't want to run a pro-Gaza appeal.

Of course, we're going to continue to be treated to claims by Hamas that they won the latest battle with Israel. Hamas thugs emerge from bunkers and behind the skirts of women and the bodies of the children they used as human shields to declare victory.

Mahmoud Abbas says that Hamas will never take over the West Bank. Big words from Abbas, considering that Fatah had its hat handed to it by Hamas in Gaza. Israel would never let that situation occur.

Humanitarian aid continues to flow into Gaza; 200 trucks a day. Hamas demands that Israel open the crossings into Israel. Israel's latest response to that is that the crossings will open only when Hamas releases Gilad Shalit. That's a damned sight better than Israel's previous stance, which was to consider the release of hundreds of Palestinian terrorists from Israeli jails in exchange for Shalit, who has been held by Hamas for more than 2.5 years.

And consider this a sign that the humanitarian situation in Gaza isn't as dire as the diplomats have warned; Egypt has delayed a conference on Gaza until March.

The Disastrous Bloomberg Budget

If you weren't sure whether New York City had the highest tax burden in the nation, Mayor Bloomberg is about to remove all doubt. He's about to call for another increase in the sales tax, bringing the rate to 8.75% (from 8.375). Throw in tax (or he'll call it a fee) on plastic bags and I'm sure that local businesses will love that as business goes across the Hudson to New Jersey where Jersey City has an enterprise zone where sales tax is 3.5%. That's on top of reports that the City's economy shrank significantly in 4Q 2008.

Property tax rebates to help lessen the burden on homeowners would be yanked.

Combine tax hikes with a slowing economy is a recipe for disaster, and yet that is what the supposed financial guru Bloomberg is about to achieve.

Bloomberg also throws out the claim that he will chop teachers and police jobs, but that's just a threat to make sure that the tax hikes go through. There's plenty of pork in the NYC budget that isn't addressed, let alone those programs that should have been shuttered years ago but still receive funding. Bloomberg is just another one of those tax and spend nanny staters. Like Governor Paterson, whose tax on soft drinks still being considered in the state but which is opposed by an overwhelming majority of people, Bloomberg is looking for money in all corners of taxpayer pockets without serious consideration to cutting the fat from public payrolls.

UPDATE:
Bloomberg gave his budget presser, and the economic fallout from the financial crisis means that Wall Street firms are set to lose $47 billion from last year.
Wall Street firms will are expected to lose an estimated $47 billion as a result of last year's financial meltdown and potentially even more this year -- dealing a staggering blow to New York's economy and forcing the city to slash 20,000 jobs to close its growing budget gap, Mayor Bloomberg said.

Bloomberg, who presented his plan this afternoon at City Hall to address the city's growing budget problems as the economic picture continues to worsen, said Wall Street's losses will affect the city for years.

The mayor said "you can only get so much blood out of a stone" -- referring to budget cuts and other measures to try and close a looming $4 billion deficit.

He said at least 20,000 municipal workers would have to be let go in order to deal with the gloomy outlook.

Bloomberg said the city is projected to lose nearly 300,000 jobs through 2010 -- an estimated 46,000 from the financial sector alone.
That's $47 billion that wont get turned into tax revenues for redistribution, which means that the city and state and federal government have to find someone else to tax.

Watch Bloomberg use the threat of teacher, police, and fire job cuts to demand that his tax hikes get adopted. It would ignore the real fat in the City's budget and that the city workforce isn't being forced to pare down its benefits or costs. It's just going to slow the increases just a bit even as the feds pump more money to the same failed programs.

The Rebuilding of Ground Zero, Part 58

With the recession looming large over the New York metro area, construction at Ground Zero continues, although building of towers 2 and 3 might take longer and end up looking quite different than previously imagined.

The Freedom Tower continues racing skyward, and now has steel extending 7-10 stories above West Street. The 9/11 memorial will be open by 9/11/2011. That's the good news.

The bad news? Tower 2 and 3 might never be built, but instead low rise buildings or even construction to grade with the provision that the towers be built at some point in the future.
The long-planned skyscrapers at Ground Zero will have to wait, but two low-slung buildings that could one day serve as their bases may go up soon, officials disclosed Thursday.

The buildings would face each other along Church St., rising two to six stories and serving as stand-ins until towers can be built.

They could even house world-class retail shops if recessionary ravages force new construction delays.

"The last thing the Port Authority will do is to leave holes and pits in the ground downtown," said Port Authority Executive Director Chris Ward after a state Assembly hearing on the status of lower Manhattan redevelopment.

"To avoid that, we will either build pedestals, which will allow some form of retail options and permit long-term subsequent construction, or build to grade."

Each would be engineered to support the immense towers that World Trade Center developer Larry Silverstein intends to build on the 16-acre site.

They would be constructed later, when the real estate market recovers.
Tower 4, which would be built on the Southeast corner of the site, would not be affected. That building's foundations are further along and financing is in place.

Now, here's a question for the pro-stimulus folks. Would it not make sense to build the buildings now, to not only keep construction workers on the job, but to take advantage of the recovering local economy? Instead, the latest changes to the construction schedules in and around Ground Zero means that construction will go on for decades.

Meanwhile, the MTA says that they expect to use nearly $500 million of the stimulus pork to complete the Fulton Street Transit Hub. Currently, it's a big hole in the ground and there's no schedule for completion. It's woefully overbudget and the resulting damage to the local businesses throws into question just what was gained by the project as the primary goal of linking together multiple subway lines is not even accomplished to date. At the same time, the South Street Ferry terminal, which was supposed to open in January may not open until April because someone at the MTA or the construction firm didn't bother to check their math and notice that the train platforms are now too far away from the trains. That's after a test train found that the platforms were too close six months ago. That means that the station can't be certified to open.

Zimbabwe Crisis Easing; Tsvingerai To Become Prime Minister?

Reuters is reporting that Morgan Tsvingirai and his opposition Movement for Democratic Change will form a government with the thug Robert Mugabe.
Tsvangirai made the announcement after a meeting of the Movement for Democratic Change's decision-making National Council.

"We are going into this government. That is what the council has decided," Tsvangirai, who is set to become prime minister, told reporters.

The decision will increase Zimbabwe's chances of recovering from economic collapse and easing a humanitarian crisis in which more than 60,000 people have been infected by cholera and more than half the population needs food aid.

Zimbabweans have been longing for a new leadership that can ease the world's highest inflation rate and severe food, fuel and foreign currency shortages. Millions have fled the suffering to neighboring countries, straining regional economies.

Western aid and financial assistance tied to the creation of a democratic government and economic reform will be crucial to rescuing what was once one of Africa's most promising countries.

"Without the support of those governments, the deal will have major difficulties in really opening the way for a turnaround of the situation in Zimbabwe," said Mike Davies, Middle East and Africa expert at risk analysts Eurasia Group.
With Mugabe still running the show, there's little that Tsvingerai can actually do here. Mugabe's ruinous economic policies destroyed the economy, shattered the infrastructure, and created the conditions that now decimate the Zimbabwean people.

That includes a cholera epidemic that is wholly avoidable had Mugabe's government paid attention to proper sanitation and potable water supplies. That includes hyperinflation that doubles the costs of goods every 24 hours (231 million percent).

Unless Tsvingerai is going to be able to reverse all of Mugabe's ruinous policies, the situation will persist, regardless of foreign assistance. It is only on that latter point that some of the suffering may be eased. Now that a government is formed, foreign governments are more likely to provide aid and assistance to the Zimbabwean government to deal with the humanitarian crises.

Clean Sweep: Illinois Senate Votes 59-0 To Remove Blagojevich

It isn't the end of the Blagojevich affair by any stretch, contrary to CBS News headlines, but it is the end the road for disgraced former Governor Rod Blagojevich, who was removed as Illinois Governor by the Illinois Senate 59-0.

Blagojevich spoke before the Senate yesterday and rambled on about how he had done so much good for the state and that if he had committed a crime, others should go down as well, including President Obama's Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and various members of the Illinois political establishment.

I'm sure that sat well with all those folks.

In the end, it didn't affect the outcome, especially since Blagojevich hinted at his culpability when he stated that he had not knowingly committed criminal acts.
Once the State House impeached him earlier this month for abuse of power, the Senate did what was expected and voted to throw Blagojevich out of office. And on an identical 59-0 roll call, it barred the two-term Democrat from ever again holding public office in the state.

"He failed the test of character. He is beneath the dignity of the state of Illinois. He is no longer worthy to be our governor," said Sen. Matt Murphy, a Republican from suburban Chicago.

The state's Democratic Lieutenant Governor (and one of Blagojevich's strongest critics), 60-year-old Quinn, was promptly sworn in as governor.

Blagojevich, 52, had boycotted the first three days of the impeachment trial, calling the proceedings a kangaroo court. But on Thursday, he went before the Senate to fight for his job, delivering a 47-minute plea that was, by turns, defiant, humble and sentimental.

He offered familiar lines: He was innocent. The trial rules were unfair. His goal always was to help people.

"You haven't proved a crime, and you can't because it didn't happen," Blagojevich told lawmakers. "How can you throw a governor out of office with insufficient and incomplete evidence?"

"I think what's been very disappointing and very frustrating to everyone involved in the process … is that the governor could have brought forward information and evidence and witnesses, and he refused at every turn to do so," Illinois State Attorney General Lisa Madigan said on CBS' The Early Show. "He didn't participate when the House was considering impeachment. He obviously refused to participate in the actual trial in front of the Senate.
Blagojevich had gone on a media blitz this week, appearing on major network morning programs and taking the plea to the people, claiming that he had never intended to carry out criminal acts and that he had done much good for the people of Illinois.

Still, Blagojevich does have a point about the impeachment process; it wasn't exactly about due process and the ability to rebut charges with the presentation of evidence. That was due, in part, to the criminal charges and the case pending in federal court on corruption charges. The prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, didn't want to undermine his criminal case and so limited the amount of evidence provided for impeachment purposes.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

President Obama Doesn't Quite Get The Concept Of Stimulus

He's busy railing at the payment of $18 billion in bonuses on Wall Street. Apparently he's not familiar with what that $18 billion represents to the economy of New York City, New York State, and New Jersey and Connecticut.

It represents a huge hit to the local economies because it's far lower than the bonuses doled out by the financial services companies throughout the region in the past. It also marks the steepest decline in 30 years. It means billions less in tax revenues and billions less that those recipients are spending on everything from restaurant bills to home and car purchases.
Overall, financial firms paid out $18.4 billion in bonuses last year, down from $32.9 billion in 2007 and an all-time-high of $34.1 billion in 2006.

The size of bonus checks shrank, too, as financial firms wrote off massive losses and some top executives decided to forgo bonuses altogether.

The average individual bonus fell 37 percent to $112,000, the lowest level since 2004. Last year, bonus checks averaged $177,000.

"The effect of the lower bonus payments will ripple throughout the regional economy and could cost the state and city of New York significant tax revenue," DiNapoli said.

The city collected $275 million less in personal income taxes due to the drop-off in bonuses last year, the comptroller found. The state, meanwhile, took a $1 billion hit.
So, as much as Obama wants to slam the financial companies for issuing bonuses, consider what those bonuses entail to the rest of the economy. They are a real and measurable stimulus to the local economy. It further means that the local economy will take a hard hit through 2009 and into 2010 as one should not expect bonuses to pick up this year or next, especially with President Obama carping on their size.

Then again, this is what you get when you put the federal government in charge of the financial industry with its TARP takeover. Obama and Congress signed off on the TARP plan, ignoring the warning signs and that the money would be spent without oversight.

So Much For That Energy Conservation

Do as I say, but don't do as I do.

There's a reason that you keep seeing all those politicians and President Obama not wearing jackets in the White House.

He's turned up the heat.

Are you kidding me? What a hypocrite.
The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr. Obama, who hates the cold, had cranked up the thermostat.

“He’s from Hawaii, O.K.?” said Mr. Obama’s senior adviser, David Axelrod, who occupies the small but strategically located office next door to his boss. “He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.”

Thus did a rule of the George W. Bush administration — coat and tie in the Oval Office at all times — fall by the wayside, only the first of many signs that a more informal culture is growing up in the White House under new management. Mr. Obama promised to bring change to Washington and he has — not just in substance, but in presidential style.
Right, this wasn't just about style. It was about Obama's comfort. Obama turned up the thermostats at a time when he's busy telling you and me to turn down our thermostats to save money.

What does he care? You're paying for his heating and cooling costs. He's got to be comfortable after all.

And lest you think I'm being a hypocrite myself, I have my thermostat set to drop to 60 degrees at night, and when I'm out of the house. When I am at home, the heat goes up to 66. We manage. We also save quite a bit of money because of insulation I've added to our attic.

Obama's excuse? Obama's flack David Axelrod says he's got to be comfortable like he was in Hawaii? Wait a moment.

Wasn't Obama living and representing the good people from the great state of Illinois? It gets pretty cold in Illinois. Chicago is known as the Windy City. Yet, Obama gets to crank up the heat?

Gotcha.

UPDATE:
Slublog notes that former President Carter at least had the courtesy to wear a sweater when he professed that the nation should conserve energy. Obama isn't even bothering to hide his disdain for everyone in saying do as I say, but not as I do.

Dan Riehl also weighs in.

BTW, I grow orchids in my house, and I don't need it to be 75 degrees for them to survive and thrive. If I kept the house 75 degrees, I'd be wearing shorts all the time.

UPDATE:
Someone needs to toughen up, and it's not just the District of Columbia's schools. Just yesterday, President Obama basically told the DC schools to suck it up and stay open despite the snow. He commented that such snows wouldn't have closed the Chicago schools.
At a meeting in the Roosevelt Room with business leaders to discuss the economy, President Obama asked to make an unrelated comment -- on the weather.

"My children's school was canceled today, because of what? Some ice," Obama said, and all at the table started laughing.

"As my children pointed out, in Chicago school is never canceled," he continued. He said that in their old hometown, "you'd go outside for recess in weather like this. You wouldn't even stay indoors."

The President said he would have to bring "some flinty Chicago toughness" to Washington.
Where's the flinty toughness President Obama? Looks like you're going to wilt unless the heat's turned up. (HT: Mrs. Lawhawk)

The Porkfest Has Its Supporters

Where is the money going to go in New Jersey? Herb Jackson spins such a rosy picture with his breakdown of where our tax dollars will be going. Oh wait. It's not our tax dollars since this is all debt financing and the federal government is borrowing a trillion dollars to put these new programs and spending plans in place. Does anyone actually think that any of this federal money is going to make its way into repairing roads or bridges in 2009, when it is most needed? I don't. New Jersey's experience in building schools has shown that it is an awful steward of tax dollars - your money. Rosy pictures of hundreds of school projects completed accompanied the plans of the School Construction Corporation (now the School Development Authority) and the billions that were appropriated for school projects. That ended up in a cesspool of corruption and half finished projects, if they were ever started at all. Consider that Jackson notes that $420 million will go to school construction and renovations. Here's New Jersey's record with a far greater sum:
The SCC was founded after July 18, 2000, when the New Jersey Educational Facilities Construction and Financing Act allocated $8.6 billion for public school construction and renovation statewide, which included $6 billion for the 31 urban "Abbott" special-needs districts.

In July 2002, then Gov. James McGreevey created the New Jersey SCC to oversee the school construction projects.

However, over the last few years, the SCC was criticized for overspending on projects and fiscal mismanagement.

When Corzine took office in 2006, he created a committee to review SCC operations and develop a new process for school construction. The committee recommended a complete overhaul of management.

Since its inception, the SCC has completed 30 new schools and 26 major renovations. But funding shrank with only a few of the beginning projects underway, with over 300 projects still pending.
Billions of dollars spent and a grand total of 56 major projects were finished out of more than 300 proposed. The New Jersey portion of the porkfest will be a drop in the bucket based on how New Jersey spends money on schools. It certainly wont provide the kind of infrastructure improvement Obama claims, and it certainly wont help this year. It probably wont even help years from now as the backlog of projects from the original SCC is so long, and that's assuming that the projects have been spec'd out. The state will likely roll the money into the general fund so as to help the bottom line of the state, rather than address the structural problems with the state budget.

Even President Obama's choice for budget chief, Peter Orszag, who previously ran the Congressional Budget Office, thinks that stimulus plans such as the one that President Obama and the Democrats are ramming through Congress are awful and do nothing to actually stimulate the economy:
Timing. The timing of fiscal stimulus is critical. If the policies do not generate additional spending when the economy is in a phase of very slow growth or a recession, they will provide little help to the economy when it is needed. (Over the long term, the key constraint to economic growth is the rate at which the capacity of firms to produce goods and services is expanded—not aggregate demand.) Poorly timed policies may do harm by aggravating inflationary pressures and needlessly increasing federal debt if they stimulate the economy after it has already started to recover.

For numerous reasons, discretionary fiscal stimulus may not be properly timed, and it has often been mistimed in the past. The failure to forecast a coming slowdown or contraction in economic activity is generally thought to be the most important reason for poor timing and is referred to as a "recognition lag." Additional problems can arise if the policy change that is adopted does not affect spending immediately or if there are lags in enacting or implementing policies.

The historical record on the effectiveness of efforts to provide discretionary fiscal stimulus is mixed.8 Much of the research indicates that fiscal policy in the 1960s and 1970s was poorly timed and, in some instances, destabilizing. By contrast, the tax rebate in 2001 provided stimulus during the recession of that period.

The recognition lag is a major challenge in applying discretionary fiscal policy, but it may not be as critical as it was before the 1990s. One of the most severe recognition lags occurred in the 1974 recession, when economists generally did not perceive the economy to be in a recession until well after it had begun. This meant that the tax rebates ultimately adopted to spur the economy did not take effect until March 1975, after the economy had already started to recover. During the two most recent recessions (in 1990 and 2001), by contrast, economic weakness was recognized relatively quickly. Concerns about slow growth—a slowing that subsequently was dated as a recession that started in August 1990—were raised in September 1990. Similarly, the stock market crash that started early in 2000 alerted economists to the possibility of a recession, and by January 2001 economists generally expected very slow growth. The 2001 recession was subsequently dated to have begun after March of that year. One of the problems that made it difficult to recognize the poor state of the economy during the 1974 episode—a high rate of inflation that distorted the perception of the underlying weakness in real economic activity—has not been a problem in recent decades.
The current porkfest doesn't actually increase spending right now while we're in the recession, but actually backloads the spending into 2010 and beyond, when economists already predict a recovery even without any stimulus package.

James Pethokoukis
notes the following as well from the CBO:
"Practically speaking, however, public works involve long start-up lags. Large-scale construction projects of any type require years of planning and preparation. Even those that are "on the shelf" generally cannot be undertaken quickly enough to provide timely stimulus to the economy. For major infrastructure projects supported by the federal government, such as highway construction and activities of the Army Corps of Engineers, initial outlays usually total less than 25 percent of the funding provided in a given year. For large projects, the initial rate of spending can be significantly lower than 25 percent.

Some of the candidates for public works, such as grant-funded initiatives to develop alternative energy sources, are totally impractical for countercyclical policy, regardless of whatever other merits they may have. In general, many if not most of these projects could end up making the economic situation worse because they would stimulate the economy at the time that expansion was already well under way."
He further notes that only 15% of the entire porkfest will actually be spent during the fiscal year ending in October. In other words, the overwhelming majority of this money (which the nation doesn't even have) isn't going to be spent until well into the future and when its effects are going to be dubious at best.

Wall Street pundits may approve of the stimulus package passage because they think that it gives them a sense of stability, but it doesn't actually improve the economic outlook. Wall Street is into whatever will provide them with free money, and a porkfest is just the thing. That's why they were cheerleading for the last stimulus package, TARP, and now the current effort. They like stability, and that the bill passed gives them hope that things will stabilize, even though it papers over real problems with the economy and doesn't actually address the supposedly critical pieces of infrastructure that Obama claims must be improved.

Speaker Pelosi says that Democrats will be held accountable for the spending. Really? When have they ever been accountable for spending? Have they ever produced a budget that was smaller than the year prior because revenues didn't match projections? Have they ever practiced fiscal responsibility? She's just trying to spin the fact that the GOP didn't go along with the porkfest as something to be proud of. The "stimulus" package still includes pork such as providing money for contraceptives and the NEA and other government entities that provide no net benefit or job creation.

And you wonder why people think that the spending isn't going to be temporary?

Somali Pirates Hijack Yet Another Tanker

Despite the efforts of the US and nearly a dozen other navies to contain and curtail the pirates who operate from Somalia, piracy continues unabated. The latest ship to be hijacked was a liquid petroleum gas tanker with a crew of 13.
It was not immediately clear what cargo the tanker was carrying, although Lloyds Maritime Intelligence told NBC News that the Longchamp carries liquid petroleum gas.

The ship left Ceuta, a Spanish enclave in Morocco, and passed through the Suez Canal on the 21st January, Lloyds said. It then turned off it's IAS guidance system — which ships can now do through the Gulf of Aden to avoid hijackings, although it also means that at present it is not known exactly where the tanker is.

Piracy taking growing toll
Piracy has taken an increasing toll on international shipping, especially in the Gulf of Aden, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes. Pirates made an estimated $30 million hijacking ships for ransom last year, seizing more than 40 vessels off Somalia's 1,900-mile coastline.

Somali waters are now patrolled by more than a dozen warships from countries including Britain, France, Germany, Iran and the United States. China and South Korea have also ordered the dispatch of warships to protect their vessels and crews from pirates.

Christensen said the protecting warships were not involved in the incident in which the Longchamp was taken. Christensen had no other details on the vessel and its crew.
As I have repeatedly noted, the only way to eliminate the piracy problem in Somalia is to go after the safe havens on shore where the pirates are able to operate from with impunity. Somalia is a failed state, which makes it the perfect incubator for terrorism and piracy.

There were 49 successful hijackings of shipping worldwide in 2008, 42 of which were in Somalia. It is the most dangerous stretch of water in the world for shipping, and that poses serious problems for international trade, since its waters lead to the Suez Canal and are a prime shipping lane for oil tankers heading from the Persian Gulf to the rest of the world.

One of the biggest problems facing the navies arrayed to stop the pirates is that they are not entirely clear on the international law on which they can stop the pirates. Piracy is not unlike terrorism, and there have been indications that terrorists might resort to piracy to fund their operations or to secure certain kinds of shipments, including liquid natural gas tankers, which could rigged to explode with a force equivalent to a small nuclear device, or ships carrying weapons or materials that can be used to make weapons.

So, where do the pirates go to get their money? London. It's an entire industry effort.
"They are negotiating for money, therefore anybody who has been on holiday and has tried to bargain with an Egyptian [market trader] for a carpet will understand how difficult it is to negotiate a conclusion. But we don't have the option of walking away, we have got to keep negotiating."

It's a radical departure from the airline hijackings of previous decades. Then, hijackers, who tended to be politically motivated, knew it was only a matter of time before special forces would be called in and try to kill them. Ransoms were often not paid.

But Somali piracy is different. Paying a ransom is not illegal under British law, unless it's to terrorists. And while governments have failed to clamp down to hijackings, a precedent of paying up has been established. So, as soon as pirates set foot on a ship they know pay day is only a matter of time.

The next link in the chain is a specialist negotiator, whose job is to try to reach a reasonable price.
You want to end piracy? You have to stop treating it as a cost of doing business and start treating it like the international security matter that it is. That means a cessation of negotiating for the release of the shipping and the hostages, and instead stating that no ransoms will be paid and the special forces are on the way. If you eliminate the incentives, the pirates will find themselves out of a job.

UPDATE:
Fred Fry International reports that a French frigate captured 9 Somali pirates (photos included). They were responding to a distress call from the cargo vessel African Ruby.

UPDATE:
At the moment, 10 ships and 179 crew members are being held by the pirates in Somalia.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

GOP Congressman Introduces IRS Rangel Rule

This may not be the way to regain Congress in 2010, but it is sure to make Democrats squirm. Republicans may find that they like life on the outside since they don't have to be the responsible ones (as Democrats are going to quickly find out now that they own the stimulus porkfest). They're going to needle and bite at the ankles of the sanctimonious and smug Democrats who think that they can do whatever they want. It means going after criminals like Rep. Charles Rangel, who evaded paying his taxes for years, and yet miraculously avoided having to pay penalties like the rest of us.

A Republican Congressman, John Carter of Texas, put a shot across Rangel's bow by introducing legislation that would give all Americans the same tax break should we find ourselves unable to pay our taxes on time.

Consider it the Rangel Rule (HT: jcbunga at LGF):
Rep. Carter introduced a bill Wednesday to eliminate all IRS penalties and interest for paying taxes past due.

The legislation calls for the creation of what he calls the, "Rangel Rule," -- drawing attention to the recent legal issues of House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., enabling citizens who fail to pay taxes on time to do so later with no additional fees.

Rangel, who writes the country's tax policies, acknowledged last fall that he failed to pay thousands in real estate taxes for rental income he earned from a property in the Dominican Republic.

As of September 2008 the Harlem Democrat reportedly paid back more than $10,000 in taxes but that did not include any IRS penalties.

"Your citizens back home should have the same rights and benefits that come to you as a member of congress. You shouldn't be treated any differently under the law than your citizens back home," Carter said.

He added that citizens should receive the "same courtesy" that the IRS is allegedly granting Rangel and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who also recently acknowledged a failure to pay taxes.
Carter is calling for Rangel to cosponsor the legislation with him. Somehow, I doubt Rangel would do that, nor do I expect Rangel to pay the penalties either.

Rangel's situation is so muddled that he's had to hire forensic accountants to figure out his actual tax bill. He doesn't even know what he owes.

This is the man chiefly responsible for setting the tax policy in the House. He sets the agenda as the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and yet his fellow Democrats have no problem with leaving him in this post despite his tax and ethics troubles.

Blagojevich To Appear At Impeachment Hearing?

That's right folks. It's going to be epic. Governor Rod Blagojevich (D-IL), who is under criminal investigation for a variety of corrupt activities and is currently being impeached by the Illinois Legislature, wants to make a closing statement at the close of the testimony tomorrow despite refusing to participate in the proceedings to date because he believed them to be unfair.

Given his penchant for reciting poems, referring to the likes of Martin Luther King, Jr., Jimmy Stewart, and other famous folks, his appearance will definitely be noteworthy.

Grab the popcorn, because it's going to be fun.

House Republicans Finally Get Serious About Pork; Democrats Ignore Infrastructure Needs

A searchable version of the bill can be found here. The Senate looks like they may be willing to amend provisions of the House version.

As Michelle Malkin notes, the Congressional Budget Office states that the true cost of this porkfest isn't $825 billion, but will really top $1.1 trillion once all interest and debt payments are factored in.

For all the talk by Obama and Democrats about how this bill will spur infrastructure repairs and that the nation's roads and bridges are in dire need of repair, replacement, and upgrade, only the tiniest portion of the package is actually going for building and repairing roads. While the WaPo claims that some Democrats are skeptical of the stimulus package and its paltry sums for infrastructure, they didn't vote against it in the House. How much of the stimulus package is for infrastructure improvements? $40 billion.
The bill to be voted on today includes $30 billion for roads and bridges, $9 billion for public transit and $1 billion for inter-city rail -- less than 5 percent of the package's total spending.
You read that right. It was all just so much talk. Obama and the Democrats instead larded up the stimulus package with their pet projects, all while the nation's infrastructure gets the shaft.

MSNBC, as expected, lumps together pork with the infrastructure portion of the bill to claim that "$550 billion in spending on roads and bridges, alternative-energy development, health-care technology, unemployment assistance, and aid to states and local governments." As previously noted, only $40 billion is going to roads and bridges and mass transit. That means $510 billion is going to all manner of other projects that gets lumped under innocuous headings.

Keep that in mind the next time you hear a story about how bridges and tunnels around the nation need major repairs, closures, crumbling levees, mass transit, and other public works lack sufficient funding. Keep that in mind as New York City struggles to build the Second Avenue Subway that would serve hundreds of thousands of people daily.

Keep that in mind as the power grid continues to groan under increasing demands for power while utilities are hard pressed to keep up with existing repair needs.

The bill provides billions of dollars for education spending, but doesn't bother to note that simply throwing money at education hasn't resulted in actual gains in performance. Throwing more money at higher education, in the form of larger Pell Grants and easier access to student loans will mean that universities can simply afford to charge higher tuition - a practice that has accelerated in recent years far beyond the rate of inflation. It actually results in making higher education less affordable and saddles students with loan obligations that rival home mortgages.

Democrats put their pet projects ahead of the national interest, claiming that this is necessary for stimulating the economy when it does no such thing and much of the money will be spent in the two years prior to the next national election in 2012. It's all designed to buy votes from people who don't realize the damage being done by such wasteful, profligate, and cynical spending.

UPDATE:
How does $335 million for STD prevention programs count as stimulus? /save the jokes for the comments.

UPDATE:
Whatever happened to the last infrastructure stimulus package, which was passed in 2005 with great fanfare? Where did all that money go?

Infrastructure of bridges and tunnels and roads requires constant upkeep to maintain it in proper working form. They need to be painted, repaired, and upgraded over time. It just isn't sexy work. It's routine. It's drudgery. It doesn't score photo ops the way building a new bridge or highway would.

The current porkfest provides only a fraction of the total amount to infrastructure repair of bridges, tunnels, and roads and mass transit. Ace wonders where are all the projects that really need major funding. I can think of four here in the NYC metro area; the full length Second Avenue Subway from Hanover Square to 125th Street, the 7 Line extension; the Hudson River tunnels (which are already partially funded from the feds, state, and PANY-NJ); a cross Hudson freight tunnel to relieve congestion throughout the NYC metro area; and expanded dredging of NY harbor for SuperPanamax ships to enter (luring business to the NYC metro area).

Other possible programs? A replacement Tappan Zee bridge, upgrades to the approach spans of the Brooklyn Bridge, new Goethals and Outerbridge Crossing spans (PANY already working towards new Goethals span).

But let's also note that Obama and his fellow Democrats want to ram this porkfest through now, because they know that the longer it's exposed to scrutiny, the quicker it will be picked apart as the porkfest it is.

Obama's Dangerous Course of Action On Iran

President Barack Obama is already carrying through on his promise to engage in direct negotiations with Iran without preconditions.
#
Barack Obama will pursue tough, direct diplomacy without preconditions to end the threat from Iran:

Obama and Biden will present the Iranian regime with a clear choice. If Iran abandons its nuclear program and support for terrorism, they would offer incentives like membership in the World Trade Organization. If Iran continues its troubling behavior, Obama and Biden will step up our economic pressure and political isolation.
Obama's Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, has signaled that this is precisely the tact she will take.
President Barack Obama's administration will engage in "direct diplomacy" with Iran, new U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice said Monday. But Rice warned that Iran must meet U.N. Security Council demands to suspend uranium enrichment before any talks on its nuclear program.

"The dialogue and diplomacy must go hand in hand with a very firm message from the United States and the international community that Iran needs to meet its obligations as defined by the Security Council," she said.

Iran still considers the U.S. the "Great Satan" but said last week it was "ready for new approaches by the United States."
Iran does far more than still consider the US the Great Satan. Iran funds and support proxy armies in Hamas and Hizbullah, engages in support of the insurgency in Iraq, has sent weapons and equipment to Iraqi insurgents that have resulted in the deaths of US soldiers, including EFPs (explosively formed projectiles that can be particularly destructive), and whose regime has never been fully held accountable for engaging in the invasion of US soil in 1979's embassy takeover.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thinks that Iran has to engage in meaningful relations with the rest of the world.

Iran is currently believed to be within a year of having enough nuclear materials for a weapon. Iran continues working on its nuclear program, bringing more centrifuges online that speed the process of enriching uranium to weapons grade. It does so in facilities built underground so as to avoid detection and air attack. The IAEA is powerless to stop this, and Iran laughs at any attempt to thwart its nuclear ambitions.

It pursues its strategy based not only on thwarting the ambitions of rival Arab and Islamic regimes in the region, but as part of a religious obligation to bring about apocalyptic visions and jihad. Ignoring the religious implications and outlook of the Iranian regime can and will have catastrophic results, and yet that is what the diplomats are about to do yet again.

Obama is basically stating that we must ignore the missile tests and announcements of new weapons systems (those that aren't fudged by the Iranians to show that they're further along on their technologies than they actually are). He is stating that we must ignore the boisterous calls to destroy Israel. He is saying we must ignore the calls to jihad and work towards peace.

It's a dangerous policy, and one that will have disastrous consequences, not only for the US, but for the entire region.

It comes at a time when President Obama has previously stated that he would cut unproven missile defense systems; the very kinds of systems that would be needed as Iran works on its longer range missile systems and delivery systems for the weapons it produces. It comes as Obama seemingly apologizes to the Arab world for actions taken by past administrations, and yet doesn't call for the Arab and Muslim world to bring the jihadis to justice, to moderate their calls for Israel's destruction, or otherwise bring an end to the rampant misogyny, anti-homosexual policies (including executing gays by hanging), stoning women who are seen with men who are not related to them, executing children, or any of the other barbaric practices that are commonly found throughout the Islamist dominated countries.

Instead, Obama apologizes for bringing the opportunity for freedom from all those barbaric practices to the 50 million people who live in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Gateway Pundit has it just right. The freedom movement is dead. Obama killed it the moment he appeared on Arab television.

Mitchell Arrives For "Listening" Tour As Hamas Continues Violence

So, George Mitchell is in the region to try and kick start the peace process that died when Hamas engaged in the rocket war following Israel's disengagement from Gaza, leaving Gaza in full Palestinian control.
After 10 days of relative calm following the cease-fires that halted the Gaza war, violence flared on Tuesday after the Israeli soldier died and Israeli troops mounted incursions into Gaza that killed one Palestinian and wounded another. The violence represented the first serious confrontations between Hamas and Israel since they declared separate cease-fires on Jan. 18.

The violence underlined the urgency of Mr. Mitchell’s mission. He planned meetings on Wednesday with President Shimon Peres and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and also scheduled discussions with the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, in the West Bank city of Ramallah.
Note that the Times claims that there was relative calm during the past 10 days until yesterday's attacks by Hamas on Israeli troops. That's patently false. Hamas continued to breach the hudna, firing rockets and mortars on Israel throughout.

Hamas continues firing on Israel.


Hamas continues to demand that Israel open border crossings into Gaza
, but why should any nation allow the terrorists access to the very materials needed to build weapons.

Hamas is speaking volumes when it says that it will never agree to a long term ceasefire agreement with Israel and that it ultimately seeks Israel's destruction.

Mitchell says it's critical that the ceasefire be extended. Critical for who? Israel loses because Hamas uses any pause to regroup and rearm, and Hamas has repeatedly stated that as its goal during any lull in fighting. Hamas considers every lull a hudna, not a ceasefire. All such lulls do is extend the fighting still longer and provides Hamas with the opportunity to procure still deadlier weapons for their war with Israel.

So, why does anyone still think that Israel must make peace with this terrorist group? Hamas doesn't care about the average Palestinian; they're cannon fodder for propaganda purposes. The dead are props to Hamas. Children are body armor for Hamas.

Diplomats are doing what they have always done; trying to make themselves seem important, and President Obama is falling into the same trap that so many other Presidents have done - lending prestige to a process in its current iteration that has no solution unless one side capitulates or is destroyed.

The smuggling of weapons and equipment into Gaza continues, and the Egyptians are not doing all they can to thwart such attempts. There are even reports that there are shipping containers full of weapons for Hamas awaiting movement into Gaza from Sinai.

Israel hit at the smuggling tunnels along the Philadelphi corridor yet again
. Given that they're so easy for the journalists to spot, Israel shouldn't have a problem going after them either. The problem is that the thugs operating those tunnels can simply rebuild them, which means that to deter further smuggling operations one either has to retake the corridor, do something to the corridor that makes it impossible to tunnel from Gaza into Egypt (build a moat, sink steel piles, or kill those smugglers involved.

The IAF says that only three tunnels were hit in today's airstrikes.

The Muqata has more details on that and other Hamas terror activities today.

The Muqata also reveals details of the Hannibal Protocol, which Israeli forces use to thwart kidnapping of soldiers should they be separated from other Israeli forces. The policy has been tightened since the Gilad Shalit kidnapping, but there's always room for improvement.

Human rights groups are looking to find fault with how Israel handled detainees during Operation Cast Lead. They aren't complaining about Hamas murdering those they believe are collaborators, but instead that Israel held suspected terrorists bound for days on end.

The usual suspects continue to urge the United Nations to investigate Israel's actions in Operation Cast Lead, all while ignoring who started the latest round of the conflict and Hamas' repeated war crimes. Fatah's Mahmoud Abbas says that they'll have proof of Israel's war crimes.

It's so typical and so infuriatingly frustrating that there are so many people who think that the UN has a solution for the Arab-Israeli conflict. The UN is a big part of the reason that the conflict has dragged on; UN condones terrorism against Israel, undermines Israel's ability to go after the terrorists who strike at Israelis, allows terrorists to operate freely in the UNRWA refugee camps, looks the other way as terrorists infiltrate UNRWA operations, and reflexively blame Israel for attacks on UNRWA and UN facilities even as Hamas fired from in and around same.

UPDATE:
UNRWA knowingly pays terrorists and engages in one-sided rhetoric designed to undermine Israel's security.

UPDATE:
Israel is going to have to revoke Hamas' Gaza privileges sooner or later; Hamas fired yet another rocket at Israel today. Watch the press call it "tenuous ceasefire holds" or other such blathering, rather than yet another tangible piece of evidence that Hamas cares nothing for ceasefires and hopes to carry on with its war with Israel by any means necessary.

They're looking to see what level of violence Israel is willing to accept - how many kassams can fall on Sderot or Ashkelon before Israel strikes back. The diplomats already have provided their answer - as many as Hamas wants before Israel strikes back. It's Israel's response that demands cessation, not Hamas attacks.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

This Is How The Stimulus Porkfest Will Pass

Just as with the legislation enacting the TARP porkfest, we're going to see Congress pass the $825 billion (well it was $825 billion before today's changes) because the Democrats keep larding it up with measures that the GOP will find that they have to vote for, like the AMT patch.

The AMT is a mess, and Congress has to adjust the limits annually so that the middle class doesn't get hammered by its imposition. Originally, the AMT was meant to catch those who took advantage of loopholes in the tax law to avoid paying any taxes under the standard tax calculations.

Now, far more than just the ultrawealthy are getting hit by it. Unless Congress does this annual dance, millions of thousands of taxpayers making as low as $150,000 are hit.

Congress is now adding the $69 billion AMT patch to the porkfest. It was added by the Senate Finance Committee earlier today, and the plan calls for the AMT to keep the number of those affected by the AMT in tax year 2009 at the same level as 2008.

The real reason it is being added is not because of the tax ramifications here, but to get those Democrats who are on the fence about supporting a porkfest, along with those few remaining fiscally responsible Republicans to go along with this mess.

The Rebuilding of Ground Zero, Part 57

Steel continues rising for the Freedom Tower, and the 9/11 Memorial and Museum continue taking shape. The pools that will form the heart of the memorial are now being formed up as the steel rises around them.

The ramp that served as the gateway into the site for dignitaries and families on the anniversaries of 9/11 has been dismantled and removed so as to make room for the memorial.

At the same time, construction continues on the PATH transit hub. The PATH system broke a new record for annual ridership, surpassing 75 million riders last year. The prior record was set in 2000, when 74 million riders used the system, which connects Newark and Hoboken with the WTC and 33rd Street stations in Manhattan. 72 million riders used the system in 2007.

PATH is expected to bring new railcars on line starting this year in a multibillion dollar upgrade to its 40 year old fleet of subway cars.

Meanwhile, still more problems at the former Deutsche Bank deconstruction site. A worker broke his leg when he was hit by an excavator.

Photo Caption of the Day

This is courtesy than none other than Governor Rod Blagojevich (D-IL), who is currently making the rounds to all the media outlets while the Illinois Legislature considers his impeachment.

Show me your jazz hands!



Leave your best captions in the comments below.

This Is the Hamas I Expected; Hamas Attacks Again

So, do you still think Hamas is trustworthy to honor agreements? Former President Carter still thinks so (reported prior to today's events). He couldn't be more hopelessly wrong. He's been proven wrong yet again.

A roadside bomb blew up near an Israeli patrol, and an Israeli soldier was killed and several others wounded.
Following the incident, the IDF fired at several targets inside Gaza and IDF soldiers briefly crossed the border in search of the attackers.

IAF helicopters hovered in the air firing machine gun bursts, Palestinian witnesses said. An IAF jet set off a loud sonic boom over Gaza City not long afterward, possibly as a warning.

Palestinians reported that several people were wounded when IDF tank shells hit residential buildings in the Strip.

It was not clear if the bomb had been planted after the cease-fire took hold, or whether it was an older device.

There was no claim of responsibility for the attack, but Mushir al-Masri, a Hamas leader, said Israel was to blame for continuing to fire into Gaza. Al-Masri said his group had not agreed to a full cease-fire but only to a "lull" in fighting.

"The Zionists are responsible for any aggression," he said.
Note that part in bold. Hamas doesn't agree to ceasefires, only hudnas. Hamas doesn't deny that they engaged in the attack, and that they blame Israel for continuing to retaliate against Gaza. They're in effect saying that the timeout that Israel has provided will be used for one purpose; to rearm and regroup for the next attack.

The New York Times reports that a Palestinian farmer and Israeli soldier were killed. Really? Who set the bomb? A farmer? Who was engaging in sniper fire against the Israelis? Farmers?

The attack was coordinated with sniper fire according to Palestinian witnesses.
Palestinian sources reported that exchanges of fire erupted in the area, including sniper fire.

Eyewitnesses said two or three gunmen were seen moving towards the border fence in the early morning hours.

Heavy gunfire was audible along the border in central Gaza and Israeli helicopters hovered in the air, firing bursts from their machine guns, the witnesses said. Two loud explosions were reportedly heard in Gaza City.
Hamas has again scattered and hidden out to avoid airstrikes. Expect the uniforms to be put back in the closet while the terrorists roam the streets waiting for word on when to resume their full scale attacks on Israel.

There are also reports of mortar or rocket fire against Israel.

Israel is also engaging in strikes against Southern Gaza.

The Muqata reports that all Israeli communities within 40km of Gaza have had their rocket/mortar warning systems reconnected. Why are they ever disconnected?

The Muqata also notes that Israel's denials that rocket attacks have occurred appears to be a political decision, and one that undermines Israeli national security. The death of an Israeli soldier and the wounding of three others can't be easily ignored. Today's attack was a coordinated strike against Israel, and as I have repeatedly warned that Israel's failure to continue Operation Cast Lead to attack Hamas targets and eliminate Hamas leadership will come back to haunt Israel as the attacks resume.

Meanwhile, word has come out that a possible reason that Hizbullah didn't open a second front in the war against Israel was that Israel threatened Syria directly that any attacks by Hizbullah would result in Israel going after the regime in Damascus. That's as good an explanation as to why Hizbullah showed restraint despite claims that they, along with other Islamists, would come to the aid of Hamas. When you threaten the regimes that back the terrorists with mortal harm, that provides a moment of clarity.

Egypt says that it wants a permanent truce in place by February. Fat chance of that happening. Today's events continue to overtake the diplomatic efforts, which repeatedly paper over the facts - namely Hamas and their unwavering intent to destroy Israel and seek a one-state solution. US envoy George Mitchell isn't going to have any better success than any of his predecessors, but it makes President Obama look like he's doing something to bring about peace and impressions count more than facts, at least according to the media and the diplomats. Terrorists don't particularly care.

There is only one thing to trust when it comes to Hamas and the other Islamic terrorist groups - that they will fight the jihad and slaughter as many people as possible in their quest. Everything else is window dressing and misdirection to lull people in to a false sense of security.

UPDATE:
Via Charles at LGF comes word that Hamas executed a former human rights worker from the Israeli group B’Tselem. The excuse? He was a "collaborator."
A Palestinian human rights activist and journalist who used to work for the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem has been executed by Hamas on charges of “collaboration” with Israel, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip said over the weekend.

They identified the man as Haidar Ghanem, 46, of Rafah.

They pointed out that Ghanem, who was a field researcher for B’Tselem, had been sentenced to death by a Palestinian Authority court in 2002 after being found guilty of passing on information to Israel that later resulted in the elimination of Fatah gunmen.

Ghanem, according to the Palestinians, was among dozens of suspected “collaborators” who were executed by Hamas during Operation Cast Lead.
Hamas has been busy murdering people they believe to be collaborators during and following Operation Cast Lead because Israeli intel was that good; so many of their caches and terror minions were hit by Israeli raids. This is a message sent to those who might support Fatah or want to see Hamas ousted from Gaza; anyone who opposes Hamas will face execution should they be caught. It's incentive not to act against Hamas.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Congolese Thug Charged In War Crimes; Hamas Does Same Without Worry

A Congolese thug is currently on trial at the International Criminal Court at the Hague for war crimes, including inducting children as young as 15 into his militia.
Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is accused of forcing children under the age of 15 to fight in the military wing of the Union of Congolese Patriots.

"Lubanga's armed group recruited, trained and used hundreds of young children to kill, pillage and rape. The children still suffer the consequences of Lubanga's crimes. They cannot forget what they saw, what they suffered, what they did," ICC chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo said as the trial opened on Monday morning.

Lubanga pleaded not guilty. His defense will not begin its opening statement until Tuesday. He sat largely impassively, in suit and tie, as the prosecution opened its case.
This is little different than what Hamas and other jihadi groups has done in Gaza and throughout the world for years on end. Hamas has been indoctrinating children in the jihad against Israel, and repeatedly marches them into battles, using them as human shields and hoping to incite Palestinians to further violence. Photo evidence courtesy of Charles at LGF.

Or see here, here, here, here, or:


That's Hizbullah indoctrinating another generation to hate Israel and seek its destruction. They're busy passing out toy guns to tots and young ones, but before long, they're out throwing rocks at Israelis, but they will be given the real thing soon enough.

Where is the world outcry and demand that Hamas leaders be indicted for war crimes and to stand trial for their actions? Nary a voice will be raised to do so, despite the overwhelming piles of evidence of just that.

UPDATE:
In video form:

Obama Targets Carmakers For New Mandates

At a time when they can't afford to produce the cars they currently manufacture, President Obama is pushing forward with new mandates that require still more onerous requirements.
Obama stressed that his goal was not to put more burdens on the auto industry but to work with carmakers on key administration goals: energy independence and combating global warming.

"It will be the policy of my administration," he said at the White House, "to reverse our dependence on foreign oil while building a new energy economy that will create millions of jobs."

"America will not be held hostage to dwindling resources," he said, adding that the government must work with California and other states — not against them — on tougher climate emissions standards for cars and trucks.

"The federal government must work with, not against, states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions," Obama said, adding that "the days of Washington dragging its heels are over. My administration will not deny facts; we will be guided by them."

He also ordered the Transportation Department to enact short-term rules on how automakers can improve fuel efficiency of their new models based on a 2007 law. The law requires that by 2020, new cars and trucks meet a standard of 35 miles per gallon, a 40 percent increase over the status quo. But the Bush administration did not set regulations in support of that law.
The proposals do not create any jobs, and barely manage to hold on to the jobs that are already present in the auto industry. Even today, GM announced that they're laying off another 2,000 jobs.

All these mandates don't mean that consumers will want to buy what General Motors or any of the other automakers are selling. For all the talk of hybrid vehicles, the Prius has just managed to sell a million units since it was introduced a decade ago, which works out to just over 100,000 units on average a year (less in the first year, but running more than 100,000 in the current year).

Toyota sells nearly half a million Camrys a year.

Those sales figures aren't going to change overnight.

It takes years to design and build cars, and even if started overnight, it would take several years to get the designed vehicles on the showroom. The automakers don't have that much time - particularly General Motors and Chrysler. They may not even have until March before they need another bailout.

General Motors is scheduled to release the Chevy Volt for the 2011 model year, and it's supposed to go 40 miles on battery power provided from plugging into an electric socket overnight. The delay is because the battery packs are troublesome and have to be rigorously tested.

Let's assume that it requires 6.5 hours of charging time, with standard voltage and amperage power socket. Is it like hooking up another fridge in your house for those 6.5 hours? I'd say so. That requires lots of power, especially since the fridge is the biggest power user in any home (absent air conditioning, which is a part year issue in most of the country).

Where is all that power going to come from. Even if you switch out all your light bulbs and put in LEDs or CFLs, you're ending up with a net increase in your power consumption from the power infrastructure that is already stressed from being at near capacity.

The ecoleftists continue to block every power plant under consideration, no matter how green they are. The NIMBY types are as busy as ever. None of Obama's plans are going to change that.

It's just so much hot air, and it's all too unfortunate that we can't use that hot air to power the nation since it's found in abundance and is completely biodegradable into crap. It's also recyclable, and reusable by pundits and brown-nosing leftists who repeat the mantra without noting that none of this is actually workable.

Generating power isn't cheap either, and costs vary widely around the nation.

PSE&G is considering an $888 million upgrade to the 'net here in NJ, including a rate increase to cover those costs. I'm sure other power providers are running similar programs and upgrading/maintenance programs. But distribution works only so well as there's power being generated somewhere, and if the eco-leftists block stable and reliable power generation, where is the power going to come from to run the Volt and all the other eco-left dream vehicles?

Besides, you're trading in one kind of emission for another. Instead of tailpipe emissions, you're having smokestack emissions (50+% of power is generated by coal in the US). The eco-left wants to reduce that number, but isn't exactly saying where and how that would ever take place. Nuclear is opposed on ideological grounds, and hydro is similarly seen as the destroyer of ecosystems. Wind power is not a panacea and neither is solar, both of which would require massive swaths of land to install collectors.

UPDATE:
Mickey Kaus makes an excellent observation about the situation with domestic automakers:
On Wednesday, UAW President Ron Gettlefinger predicted there would be no wage cuts as part of the union’s concessions to GM and Chrysler. Gettlefinger argued Toyota’s workers actually make $2-per-hour more than UAW workers, if you count bonuses. But … but. … Toyota did not go bankrupt. … Toyota hasn’t had to be rescued with $17.4 billion of taxpayer money. … If Toyota can afford to pay its workers $2/hour more than UAW workers–perhaps because it doesn’t have to build cars under the union’s legalistic work rule system–that’s great. It doesn’t mean Gettlefinger’s workers have a right to $28/hour if at that wage their employers can’t stay in business without an ongoing multi-billion dollar subsidy. I’m sorry if this seems obvious. It’s apparently not obvious enough.

Pelosi's Inane Rant of the Day

Well, this should get your blood boiling. Apparently birth control is good for the economy.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family planning services. How is that stimulus?

PELOSI: Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children's health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those - one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So no apologies for that?

PELOSI: No apologies. No. we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy.
She's attempting to justify porkbarrel spending on a pet program - contraceptives and birth control - by claiming that birth control will reduce the need for education, health care, and everything else.

If these leftists are so interested in saving the economy and environment, how about doing it themselves by not procreating. You don't need the government to do that, just self-control. That would save everyone from all the hot air we're exposed to incessantly by the radical leftists.

Pelosi is basically telling people to do as I say, but not as I have done, as she's a mother of 5 children and has 6 grandchildren. I don't see her telling her kids to stop having kids.

It is without a doubt expensive to have kids. There's production costs for all the stuff that growing kids need, from baby formula, strollers, clothes, to costs of education. That's money that goes to school districts, teachers, and all the related industries that support school operations (publishers, manufacturers, maintenance, construction, etc.) All that money goes somewhere, and that includes corporations that pay taxes on that income, wages earned by all the people working for those stores, businesses, schools, and ancillary activities that people rely on.

It costs $190,000 to raise a child to the age of 18, and that's a conservative figure at best. Throw in college, which can cost another $100,000, and you're talking real money.

That's real income earned by all those people, and Pelosi is telling us to throw that all away because it costs money, but contraceptives will save us money in the long run?

Expect to hear lots more of this claptrap in the years to come.

UPDATE:
Here's the video, courtesy of Ms. Underestimated:



Note too that contraceptives and birth control will also include abortions, which is one of the pet causes of the left. Nice. The Democrats now think that the way to stimulate the economy is to encourage abortions and birth control.