She's been trying to play the leniency card, noting that she's being treated for breast cancer, as though that somehow mitigates the fact that she damaged US national security by violating agreements made with the federal government not to do what she did.
I'm hoping the book is thrown her way.
It's one thing to claim that you're zealously representing your clients. It's quite another to actively break the law and threaten national security by passing communications from your terrorist clients to foreign nationals who are using those communications to rally others to jihad.
Ed Morrissey notes that Stewart is also trying to play up that she acted irrationally and wasn't in control of her emotions, which is hogwash considering that she was caught on tape laughing it up with her co-conspirators and the convicted terrorists. She knew exactly what she was doing, and this is nothing but a last gasp chance at not spending the rest of her life behind bars. She'd like people to think she was a patsy, but the facts of the case belie that point.
Michelle Malkin and Hot Air are both covering the proceedings. Also, Sister Toldjah has updates.
Still no word on the sentencing, but others are weighing in on Stewart's latest attempts at swaying the judge. Confederate Yankee is not moved.
The Sentencing Law and Policy Blog weighs in as well and thinks the judge will rely on the sentencing guidelines, a portion of which I have cited below:
§2M5.3. Providing Material Support or Resources to Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations or For a Terrorist PurposeSince Stewart was convicted of providing material support to foreign terrorist groups (a level 26 offense), the sentence appears to range anywhere from 63-78 months all the way up to 120-150 months per count (that's from Chapter 5, Part A of the Sentencing Guideline (Nov. 2005)). That's a range of 5+ years all the way up to 10 years per count.
(a) Base Offense Level: 26
(b) Specific Offense Characteristic
(1) If the offense involved the provision of (A) dangerous weapons; (B)
firearms; (C) explosives; (D) funds with the intent, knowledge, or reason
to believe such funds would be used to purchase any of the items
described in subdivisions (A) through (C); or (E) funds or other material
support or resources with the intent, knowledge, or reason to believe they
are to be used to commit or assist in the commission of a violent act,
increase by 2 levels.
(c) Cross References
(1) If the offense resulted in death, apply §2A1.1 (First Degree Murder) if the
death was caused intentionally or knowingly, or §2A1.2 (Second
Degree Murder) otherwise, if the resulting offense level is greater than
that determined above.
(2) If the offense was tantamount to attempted murder, apply §2A2.1 (Assault
with Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted Murder), if the resulting
offense level is greater than that determined above.
Others blogging: Blue Crab Boulevard and Outside the Beltway (who calls Stewart's actions treasonous).
Six Meat Buffet isn't pulling punches on Stewart's trechary. Stop the ACLU provides a roundup. Brainster picks up on some of Stewart's supporters, and their anti-Bush, pro-terror stance. Argghhh! notes that if Stewart was to be the media martyr, then she better do the time.
Tammy Bruce and Macranger want the key thrown away. 30 years, demanded by the prosecutors, isn't quite life, but it's pretty close.
Meanwhile, the Leftists think that you should stand up for Stewart and her treasonous activities. It's a principled stand against the Bush Administration. Or so that line of thinking (if you can call it that) goes. Because her conviction isn't about her own actions, and undermining US national security, but the US government going too far.
Her supporters would like you to think that Stewart has already been hit with the harshest punishment, the inability to defend clients. Well, that is and was just the starting point. Stewart undermined national security, and the conviction is clear proof of that. Her shifting excuses after the conviction show that she is doing everything imaginable to avoid the harsh sentence that she richly deserves.
TWENTY EIGHT MONTHS. Yes, you read that right. That's all she got for undermining US national security. Via CNN.
Here's more details on the convictions and sentencing.
The indictment against Stewart, Yousry and Sattar was brought by former Attorney General John Ashcroft in 2002.This is nothing but a slap on the wrist for these criminal activities. And yet, this is the kind of thing that the Left believes should dominate our handling of terrorism related issues - put it in the hands of the courts, not Congress or the Executive. The court got this one wrong. Yousry's sentence was not announced at the time of these releases.
Koeltl sentenced Sattar to 24 years in prison on Monday. Convicted of conspiracy to kill and kidnap people in a foreign country, he could have been sentenced to a life term.
Koeltl said he departed from the federal sentencing guidelines for Sattar because no one was killed or injured as a result of the crimes and because of Sattar's lack of previous crimes and restrictive prison conditions.
Bet on Stewart being quite the draw on her release from prison in little over two years.
So what sentencing guideline did the judge rely upon in sentencing Stewart? Also, why the discrepancy between Sattar's sentence and Stewarts. Both were convicted of the same crime, and Stewart's presence was what enabled Sattar to transmit the information from Rahman to his overseas minions.
This slap on the wrists is not sitting well with quite a few folks.
Stewart was not a lefty lawyer beguiled by danger. Her legal career was built on defending people who sought the violent overthrow of America. Past clients include members of the Black Panthers and the Weather Underground. To Hays, Stewart is merely a person who will “question authority and defend unpopular figures.”Amen to that.
Yes, people who want to overthrow the nation through violence aren’t very popular. And the grandmas who help them deserve lengthy terms in prison.
In the Bullpen wonders what would have happened if the defendant was an Arab American. I'd suggest look across the docket and see Sattar. He got 24 years for substantially the same criminal charges.
Stop the ACLU, Hot Air are not happy campers either.
Others blogging, and registering similar responses: Texas Rainmaker, Blue Star Chronicles, Ace of Spades, and FFDB.
Ed Morrissey notes that this is yet another reason to not rely upon the law enforcement model of fighting terrorism.
Others blogging: Clarity and Resolve, Sam Houston, Discarded Lies, Left Wing=Hate, AJ Strata, Tinkerty Tonk, Bullwinkle Blog, Blogs for Bush, Environmental Republican, Cake or Death, California Yankee, and Freedom Folks.
Stewart is appealing the case, and will remain out of prison on bail, pending the hearing. Prosecutors were extremely disappointed in the judge's reduction in the sentence, and are considering an appeal of their own.
Technorati: lynne stewart, terrorism.