The malfeasance that the Times considered sufficient to demand him stepping down has increased since then:
- Failed to reveal more than $3 million in business income;
- Failed to report income from sales of real property;
- Failed to report income from Punta Cana hacienda;
- Failed to pay property taxes on Glassboro, New Jersey property for several tax quarters ($159.39 is most recent tax due for 2Q and 3Q 2009);
- Failed to report $430,000 in stock transactions;
- Had to dramatically revise House filings to show hundreds of thousands of dollars in transactions - unreported assets that concealed anywhere from $38,000 to $116,000 in income for 2007 alone;
- Failed to report a checking account that was worth between $250,000 and $500,000.
- Failed to report income to the IRS; paid $10,000 in back taxes but no penalties or interest was apparently assessed (Rep. John Carter (R-TX) introduced the Rangel rule to codify the IRS treatment of Rangel, but it was defeated by House Democrats);
- Pay to play with AIG and CCNY over the financing of the Charles Rangel Center for Public Service;
- Broke House rules on reporting trips;
- Broke New York State Rent Stabilization laws by owning four units and using one as an office (anyone else in that situation would have been booted from the properties);
- Alternatively broke New York State Rent Stabilization laws or lied on mortgage application documents claiming primary residence status for either the rent stabilized apartments in Harlem, or other properties - the outcome of which is that he received better mortgage terms, or enabled himself to unjustly enrich himself over the span of decades by obtaining a rent stabilized apartment at a time when there's a regular shortage of affordable housing in Manhattan;
- Fails to meet New York State Rent Stabilization income guidelines with new revelations that he's making more than $175,000 - and quite likely much more than that based on hidden income over the years (rent stabilization means that he's saving nearly $4,000 a month over market rates for same property - a perk that means he's saving $48,000 a year or more than the gross income of many of his constituents);
- Paid lawyers hired to unravel Rangel's tax situation $121,000 from his campaign committee funds, which violate federal election laws (Rangel claims that he got a waiver from FEC; FEC says otherwise);
- Unjustly received a homestead property tax deduction on a D.C. property (again claiming primary residence status);
- Gave contract to his son's company worth nearly $80,000 for building websites that were non-functional and whose value experts believe cost no more than $100; and
- Failed to report imputed income from long term use of House parking lot to store vehicles, which was also a violation of House ethics guidelines.
No comments:
Post a Comment