Are you kidding me? Bogus photos or mislabeled photos or photo-edited photos are somehow sufficient to disqualify her or shows that Palin has a lack of judgment?
I guess all those photo-hackers on the left couldn't work up the nerve to uncover or reveal photos of Hillary in similar positions, so they are taking their pent up frustrations with Palin instead.
How exactly does any of that disqualify her as a VP nominee? How do bikini photos disqualify her either? I'm curious as to how exactly this works as a smear? Are people so puritanical that they want their women to be covered up? Seems like misogyny to me.
And while I'm on it, Obama can associate with racists (Rev. Wright); unrepentant terrorists and hate America types (Weather Underground terrorists Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers), but if Palin shows a wee bit of skin that somehow disqualifies her? Sorry, while the media will drum the nudies, it's the former that is a far better judge of character and fitness than the latter.
UPDATE:
John Quincy Adams used to swim naked in the Potomac River while serving as President. I'd take Palin over Adams. A comparison:
Sarah Palin:
No comments:
Post a Comment