It appears that my suspicions were right that something was fishy about the Los Angeles Times' coverage of the recent news on the surrender of a major FARC leader.
Patterico has the followup and notes that the evidence keeps rolling in suggesting that the materials that the LAT claims was unconfirmed, was in fact, confirmed.
The question remains why would the LAT make such an egregious error in their reporting on FARC.
No comments:
Post a Comment