Democrats Caving On War Funding... Again

Reality is beginning to catch up with Congressional Democrats. Not only are they behind the curve on what is going on in Iraq, but they've been on the wrong side for so long that they're going to piss off their core constituency.

House Democratic leaders could complete work as soon as Monday on a half-trillion-dollar spending package that will include billions of dollars for the war effort in Iraq without the timelines for the withdrawal of combat forces that President Bush has refused to accept, House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said yesterday.

In a complicated deal over the war funds, Democrats will include about $11 billion more in domestic spending than Bush has requested, emergency drought relief for the Southeast and legislation to address the subprime mortgage crisis, Hoyer told a meeting of the Washington Post editorial board.

If the bargain were to become law, it would be the third time since Democrats took control of Congress that they would have failed to force Bush to change course in Iraq and continued to fund a war that they have repeatedly vowed to end. But it would also be the clearest instance yet of the president bowing to a Democratic demand for more money for domestic priorities, an increase that he had promised to reject.

"The way you pass appropriations bills is you get agreement among all the relevant players, among which the president with his veto pen is a very relevant player," Hoyer said. "Everybody knows he has no intention of signing anything without money for Iraq, unfettered, without constraints. I think that's ultimately going to be the result."

The Democrats plan to take a three-step approach to completing the deal. House leaders are considering an initial allotment of about $30 billion, ostensibly for the war in Afghanistan and some other military needs, which all sides in the deal recognize could be shifted to fund the Iraq war.

Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) then would allow Republicans to increase that amount to avert a filibuster of the spending bill in the Senate. The goal of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is $70 billion for the war, more than the $50 billion short-term funding that House Democrats initially proposed but far less than the $196 billion Bush has sought.

Democrats have lost again, and the GOP is going to deliver to President Bush what he's been asking for for months.

Congressional Democrats had been holding up the military appropriations for months seeking partisan political advantage and they failed to convince anyone that they were supporting the troops by withholding that funding.

The Democrats agenda was to defund the war, even as the Surge showed significant and impressive gains in Iraq. They continued to hold to this position, even after some Congressional Democrats began seeing the light. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi both held to the defeat and retreat line and demanded timelines, all of which were an affront to the US military, which showed that its changed strategy was winning in Iraq and defeating al Qaeda and insurgents in Iraq.

Don Surber has more.