One would think after seeing the WTC attacked on 9/11 that businesses and government agencies alike would spend more time evaluating their infrastructure needs and business continuation plans in the event of debilitating events.
The problem is that the MTA has not done this in any meaningful way. Yes, they are to be applauded for restoring the 1/9 service within 18 months after the attacks, but the continued reliance on 80+ year old equipment throughout the system is a cause for alarm. The fire that damaged a single relay room at Chambers Street will take out the entire C line for months and severely restrict service on the A. How come there were no contingency plans in place? How come there wasn't a capital plan to update and secure these facilities?
Why aren't the heads of the MTA being held accountable for their actions?
No comments:
Post a Comment